<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 587 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355166</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand against the appellant for imported Dyed Woven Fabrics due to insufficient evidence and inability to retest samples, as the original testing lacked validation and the department failed to provide corroborative evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 587 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355166</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand against the appellant for imported Dyed Woven Fabrics due to insufficient evidence and inability to retest samples, as the original testing lacked validation and the department failed to provide corroborative evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>