2018 (2) TMI 522
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....issue. Therefore, they are taken together for decision. Sr.No. Appeal No. Appellant (In short) Impugned Order Period Amount (Rs.) (D- Duty) (P- Penalty) 1. E/1044/2012 Swati Biscuits 21-30/CE/APPL/KNP/2012 Dated 31.01.2012 July 08 to Dec 8 D-793555/- P-793555/- 2. E/1045/2012 Swati Biscuits ----DO---- July 09 to Dec 09 D-1018080/- P-1018080/- 3. E/1046/2012 Om Prakash ----DO---- P-1,00,000/- 4. E/1047/2012 Om Prakash ----DO---- P-2,00,000/- 5. E/1048/2012 Rishi Bakers....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....12 Rama Krishna Bakers 194-195/CE/APPL/KNP/2012 Dated 26.06.2012 July 10 to Dec 10 D-8,76,106/- 16. E/2787/2012 Rajiv Telerja ---DO--- P-1,50,000/- 17. E/3618/2012 Annakut Biscuits 262-265/CE/APPL/KNP/2012 Dated 30.08.2012 July 10 to Dec 10 D-14,72,990/- 18. E/3619/2012 Naveen Khanna ---DO--- P-3,00,000/- 19. E/3620/2012 Ambaji Food ---DO---- Oct 08 to July 09 & May 10 to 11.9.11 D-40,16,1....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e, the benefit of Notification No. 67/1995-CE for sugar syrup as intermediate product became inapplicable. Therefore, the appellants were issued with various show cause notices demanding Central Excise duty on intermediate product sugar syrup captively consumed in the manufacture of biscuits. The said show cause notices were adjudicated through various Orders-in-Original where the demands were confirmed. Aggrieved by the said Orders-in-Original appellant preferred appeal before learned Commissioners (Appeals). Learned Commissioners (Appeals) through above stated five Orders-in-Appeal decided the said appeals. Learned Commissioners (Appeals) in all the above stated Orders-in-Appeals upheld the Orders-in-Original except in the case of said Or....
TaxTMI