<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 522 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355101</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in all 23 appeals concerning the classification of sugar syrup under Tariff Item No. 17029090. It was determined that sugar syrup used in biscuit manufacturing did not attract Central Excise Duty due to insufficient evidence of its marketability. The interpretation of relevant notifications, changes in duty exemptions, adjudication of show cause notices, and the applicability of penalties were pivotal in the case. The decisions of the learned Commissioners (Appeals) varied, but the Tribunal&#039;s consistent findings on the marketability of sugar syrup influenced the favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 07:22:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=508350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 522 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355101</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in all 23 appeals concerning the classification of sugar syrup under Tariff Item No. 17029090. It was determined that sugar syrup used in biscuit manufacturing did not attract Central Excise Duty due to insufficient evidence of its marketability. The interpretation of relevant notifications, changes in duty exemptions, adjudication of show cause notices, and the applicability of penalties were pivotal in the case. The decisions of the learned Commissioners (Appeals) varied, but the Tribunal&#039;s consistent findings on the marketability of sugar syrup influenced the favorable outcome for the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>