2009 (1) TMI 916
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....as under:- On 22/06/2001, the Respondent filed a Criminal Complaint being S.C.C.No. 923 of 2001 in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akkalkot V/s. 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. It has been alleged that the Petitioners, engaged in the garment business allegedly borrowed money to the tune of Rs. 5,00,000/- from the Respondent/ Complainant. 3. On 15/05/2001, Petitioner No.2 being a partner issued a cheque No.923237 dated 28/04/2001 of Rs. 5,00,000/- in favour of Respondent. 4. On presentation of the said cheque, it was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds and returned to the Respondent on 10/05/2001. 5. On 25/06/2001, the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority issued a letter to the member S....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sing point of jurisdiction of the Civil Court; and that the Respondent wants the amount without paying the Court fee of Rs. 50,000/-. 13. On 18/07/2007, the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division has disposed off the objection as raised by the Petitioners and directed to proceed with the execution by the Judgment and order. Hence this Petition. 14. Admittedly, by the consent of the parties, as parties have voluntarily agreed and settled the matter, the Lok Adalat on 20th July, 2003 has passed the award which has force of decree under the act. The complaint was disposed of accordingly. The Petitioners did not comply with the same award therefore, the execution application filed by the Respondent against the Petitioners (Judgment Debtors)....
TaxTMI