2018 (1) TMI 642

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....S. SIVAGNANAM, J. For The Petitioner : Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan For The Respondents : Mr.K.S.Ramasamy, Senior Panel Counsel ORDER Heard Mr. Hari Radhakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K. S. Ramasamy, learned Senior Panel Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. The petitioner is before this Court challenging the notice issued by the first respondent dated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned demand stating that they were not aware as to how the Department has quantified the interest of Rs. 15,49,857/-. According to the petitioner, the interest payable is only Rs. 1. 91 lakhs. There appears to be a gross difference between the amount claimed and the amount calculated by the petitioner. The petitioner raised one more contention before this Court stating that no notice was issued to ....