2018 (1) TMI 641
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.....11717 of 2004 And W.P.M.P.No.13773 of 2004 - -<br>Central Excise<br>MR. T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J. For The Petitioner : Mr.M.A.Mudimannan for Mr.K.Jayachandran For The Respondents : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Panal counsel ORDER Heard Mr.M.A.Mudimannan, learned counsel for Mr.K.Jayachandran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior Panal Counsel appearing for respondents....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... relating to denial of Modvat credit itself was set-aside, the penalty ought to have been set aside in its entirety and not to a partial extend. To that extent, the impugned order calls for interference. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in terms of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, the value ought to have been take as cum-duty price and accordingly, ....