Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (7) TMI 28

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....under section 44BB(2) and therefore, only 10 per cent. of that amount may be treated as income of the assessee? 2. Observing that the amount of corporate taxes paid by the OIL on behalf of the non-resident company does not amount to perquisite within the meaning of section 28 (iv)?" The relevant assessment years are 1985-86 to 1988-89. The assessee, M/s. Compagine General-de-Geophysique, a non-resident company, entered into a contract with Oil India Ltd., for exploration, production and transportation of crude oil and natural gas. Amongst the terms of the contract, the corporate tax of the NRE company was to be borne by Oil India Ltd. As per those terms, Oil India Ltd. paid the contracted sums for the job done by the assessee-company and....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e. That view has been affirmed even by the Taxation Tribunal. None appeared for the assessee. We have heard learned counsel for the Department, Mr. Bhandawat, who has supported case of the Department and the view taken by the Assessing Officer and also furnished details and total receipts as also amount of tax paid in all the four years: Details of total receipts and amount paid: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment year       Amount received        Tax paid       Surtax paid ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1985-86  &nb....