<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 28 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11232</link>
    <description>The High Court held that only 10% of corporate taxes paid by an Indian company on behalf of a foreign company for oil and gas operations should be taxed under section 44BB(2), not the entire amount as a perquisite under section 28(iv). The Court emphasized the non obstante clause in section 44BB, mandating taxation at 10% of the gross receipts. The decision aligned with a precedent from the Orissa High Court, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s interpretation and ruling in favor of the assessee, providing clarity on tax treatment under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 28 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11232</link>
      <description>The High Court held that only 10% of corporate taxes paid by an Indian company on behalf of a foreign company for oil and gas operations should be taxed under section 44BB(2), not the entire amount as a perquisite under section 28(iv). The Court emphasized the non obstante clause in section 44BB, mandating taxation at 10% of the gross receipts. The decision aligned with a precedent from the Orissa High Court, rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s interpretation and ruling in favor of the assessee, providing clarity on tax treatment under the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>