Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (4) TMI 9

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ications under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, are at the instance of the Revenue from the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dated September 3,1997. Income-tax Reference No. 43 of 1998 pertains to the assessment year 1981-82 and Income-tax Reference No. 1 of 1998 pertains to the assessment year 1982-83 and the same assessee, namely, Ishwardass Mutha. In D.B. Income-tax Refe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tax (Appeals). Before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, it was contended that the Assessing Officer has committed error in taking the debit side only, he could take into account the peak credit. This contention was accepted and worked out the peak credit of Rs. 48,000 out of the addition of Rs. 78,000 made by the Assessing Officer. Thus, the Tribunal sustained the addition only to the extent of p....