1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court rejects reference applications under Income-tax Act for assessment years 1981-82 & 1982-83.</h1> The High Court of Rajasthan rejected two reference applications under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1981-82 and ... Additions on account of alleged unexplained investment in the money-lending business - Before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, it was contended that the Assessing Officer has committed error in taking the debit side only, he could take into account the peak credit. This contention was accepted and worked out the peak credit of Rs. 48,000 out of the addition of Rs. 78,000 made by the Assessing Officer. Thus, the Tribunal sustained the addition only to the extent of peak credit of Rs. 48,000 - Held that no referable question arises from the order of the Tribunal β Revenueβs appeal is dismissed The High Court of Rajasthan rejected two reference applications under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, pertaining to the assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83 for the same assessee, Ishwardass Mutha. The court upheld additions made by the Assessing Officer but reduced one of them based on peak credit calculation. The court found no referable question from the Tribunal's order and rejected both reference applications.