Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2015 (8) TMI 1424

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....MENT 1. This appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("Act") is directed against the order dated September 10, 2014 passed by the Income- tax Appellate Tribunal ("ITAT") in I. T. A. No. 729/Del/2011 for the assessment year ("AY") 2006-07 (Consolidated Finvest and Holdings Ltd. v. Asst. CIT [2015] 4 ITR (Trib)-OL 67 (Delhi)). 2. The respondent-assessee filed a return for the assessm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Shares ("OCPS")) of JPL at Rs. 10 each at a premium of Rs. 5 per share aggregating to Rs. 99 crores against which a sum of Rs. 66 crores was paid on account of OCPS capital and Rs. 33 crores on account of premium. The zero per cent. OCPS was converted into 2 per cent. RCPS with effect from March 3, 2004. During the financial year 2005- 06, the 2 per cent. RCPS were redeemed at a face value of Rs.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the assessment year under consideration, that the Assessing Officer held the transaction to be bogus. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal pointed out that with no significant event having taken place, except redemption of the 2 per cent. RCPS, there was no basis for the Assessing Officer to have concluded that the entire transaction to be bogus. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal further noted that ....