Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2016 (12) TMI 1654

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re perverse in holding that for the purpose of limitation under section 158BE, the period is to be counted from the date on which the direction under section 142(2A) is served on the assessee and not from the date of issue of direction by the Assessing Officer under section 142(2A) ? 2. Whether the order of the Tribunal is perverse in holding that the block assessment order was barred by limitation despite there being specific provision of section 158BE Explanation 1 clause (ii) that period for exclusion will commence from the day on which the Assessing Officer gives a direction under section 142(2A) ?" 3. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a partner of M/s. Jai Bharat Fruit Co., Subzi Mandoi, Kota engaged in the busine....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 2001, subsequently the then Assessing Officers, having jurisdiction over this case issued further notices under sections 143(2) and 142(1) coupled with query letters, which were duly served upon the assessee pursuant to which the assessee made partial compliance. Having regard to the peculiar nature and complexity involved in the seized books of account and documents, and in the background of : (a) No maintenance of regular or proper books of account with regard to certain business activities ; (b) Close inter-connection and inter-linking with business associates and seizure of incriminating documents and duplicate sets of accounts, etc., showing substantial tax evasion ; (c) Incompleteness of financial or accounting records relating to co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was submitted by the assessee on July 17, 2001. 5. Therefore, the questions which came for the consideration is as to whether the order of the assessment which has been passed on August 24, 2001 is time barred or not. For deciding this issue, it will be apt to reproduce provisions of section 158BE which reads as under : "158BE. (1) The order under section 158BC shall be passed,- (a) within one year from the end of the month in which the last of the authorisations for search under section 132 or for requisition under section 132A, as the case may be, was executed in cases where a search is initiated or books of account or other documents or any assets are requisitioned after the 30th day of June, 1995, but before the 1st day of January,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion ; or (iii) the time taken in reopening the whole or any part of the proceeding or giving an opportunity to the assessee to be re-heard under the proviso to section 129 ; or (iv) in a case where an application made before the Settlement Commission under section 245C is rejected by it or is not allowed to be proceeded with by it, the period commencing on the date on which such application is made and ending with the date on which the order under sub-section (1) of section 245D is received by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under sub-section (2) of that section, shall be excluded : Provided that where immediately after the exclusion of the afore said period, the period of limitation referred to in sub-section (1) or sub....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... State of Kerala [1997] 227 ITR 38 (Ker) and CIT v. N. C. John and Sons Ltd. [2002] 253 ITR 524 (Ker) ; [2002] 172 CTR (Ker) 685. 8. We have heard counsel for the appellant. 9. In this appeal, sub-clause (ii) is required to be interpreted. However, counsel for the appellant has taken us to sections 153 and 153A which came up for consideration before the Kerala High Court and other courts. 10. It cannot be disputed that the period of exclusion will commence from the day on which the Assessing Officer gives a direction under section 142(2A) and would end on the day when the assessee furnishes such audit report. According to us, the date of issuance of the notice (i.e., January 18, 2001) is the day on which the Assessing Officer had taken ....