Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2017 (11) TMI 863

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tal endorsement that "no such addressee in the door number", and when the appellant had refused to receive the notice, not cooperated with the department, the conduct of the dealer cannot be ignored. Adverting to the contention of the appellant that they have surrendered Registration Certificate as early as on 30.11.2011 and though, Local Delivery Book was produced to substantiate surrender of Registration Certificate, declining to accept the same as proof of surrender of Registration Certificate, and that grounds raised being questions of fact, vide common order dated 30.06.2016, dismissed the writ petitions, giving liberty to the petitioner, either to seek for rectification of the orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Perur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore, respondent herein, by invoking the power under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 by filing a petition or to file an appeal before the Appellate Authority. 3. Assailing the correctness of the common order made in W.P. Nos.21322 to 21325 of 2016, instant writ appeals have been filed. Though Mr.C.Baktha Siromoni, learned counsel for the appellant, reiterated the same facts and urged this court to enterta....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rong case or that there exist good grounds to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction." 3.4. In United Bank of India Vs. Satyawati Tondon and Others {(2010) 8 SCC 110}, the Hon'ble Apex Court, at paragraph Nos.43 to 45, held as follows:- "43. Unfortunately, the High Court overlooked the settled law that the High Court will ordinarily not entertain a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution if an effective remedy is available to the aggrieved person and that this rule applies with greater rigour in matters involving recovery of taxes, cess, fees, other types of public money and the dues of banks and other financial institutions. In our view, while dealing with the petitions involving challenge to the action taken for recovery of the public dues, etc., the High Court must keep in mind that the legislations enacted by Parliament and State Legislatures for recovery of such dues are a code unto themselves inasmuch as they do not only contain comprehensive procedure for recovery of the dues but also envisage constitution of quasi-judicial bodies for redressal of the grievance of any aggrieved person. Therefore, in all such cases, the high Court must insist that before availing....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ourt has recognised some exceptions to the rule of alternative remedy i.e, where the statutory authority has not acted in accordance with the provisions of the enactment in question, or in defiance of the fundamental principles of judicial procedure, or has resorted to invoke the provisions which are repealed, or when an order has been passed in total violation of the principles of natural justice, the proposition laid down in Thansingh Nathmal Case {Thansigh Nathmal Vs. Supt. of Taxes, AIR 1964 SC 1419}, Titaghur Paper Mills Case {Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd Vs. State of Orissa (1983) 2 SCC 433} and other similar judgments that the High Court will not entertain a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution if an effective alternative remedy is available to the aggrieved person or the statute under which the action complained of has been taken itself contains a mechanism for redressal of grievance still holds the field. Therefore, when a statutory forum is crated by law for redressal of grievances, a writ petition should not be entertained ignoring the statutory dispensation. 16. In the instant case, the Act provides complete machinery for the assessment/reassessment of tax, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....a and Another {(2015) 6 SCC 773}, at para36, the Apex Court held as follows:- "The aforesaid decisions rendered by this Court can be summarised as follows:- (i). The power of judicial review vested in the High Court under Article 226 is one of the basic essential features of the Constitution and any legislation including the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 cannot override or curtail jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India (Refer: L.Chandrakumar Vs. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 261 and S.N.Mukherjee Vs. Union of India (1990) 4 SCC 594. (ii). The jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 and this Court under Article 32 though cannot be circumscribed by the provisions of any enactment, they will certainly have due regard to the legislative intent evidenced by the provisions of the Acts and would exercise their jurisdiction consistent with the provisions of the Act (Refer: Mafatlal Industries Ltd., Vs. Union of India (1997) 5 SC 536. (iii). When a statutory forum is created by law for redressal of grievances, a writ petition should not be entertained ignoring the statutory dispensation. (Refer: Nivedita Sharma Vs. Cellular Operators A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ers passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Perur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore, dated 6.1.2016, for the year 2012-13, reads as under: "Sales suppression for the year 2012-2013 On cross verification of their sales details taken from other your Annexure-I, it was found that though they have made sales to the following dealers but suppressed by them in a malafide intention to evade payment of tax by not filing the returns as required under Sec. 19 of the TNVAT Act, 2006. From the reading of the assessment order for the year 2012-13, it could be deduced that there was a prima facie opinion of sales suppression for the year 2012-2013. Another issue considered by the Assessing Officer is local sales effected through van not reported in monthly returns. 8. Section 19 of the TNVAT Act, 2006 is reproduced. 19. Input tax credit : - (1) There shall be input tax credit of the amount of tax paid under this Act, by the registered dealer to the seller on his purchases of taxable goods specified in the First Schedule : [Provided that the registered dealer, who claims input tax credit, shall establish that the tax due On purchase of goods has actually been paid in the manner prescribed by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o input tax credit shall be allowed in respect of sale of goods exempted under section 15 (b) No input tax credit shall be allowed on tax paid [or Payable] in other States or Union Territories on goods brought into this State from outside the State. [Omitted] (c) No input tax credit shall be allowed on the purchase of goods sold as such or used in the manufacture of other goods and sold in the course of inter - State trade or commerce falling under sub - section (2) of section 8 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.(Central Act 74 of 1956).] (6) No input tax credit shall be allowed on purchase of capital goods, which are used exclusively in the manufacture of goods exempted under section 15. [Provided that on the purchase of capital goods which are used in the manufacture of exempted goods and taxable goods, in put tax credit shall be allowed to the extent of its usage in the manufacture of taxable goods in the manner prescribed.] (7) No registered dealer shall be entitled to input tax credit in respect of - (a) goods purchased and accounted for in business but utilised for the purpose of providing facility to the proprietor or partner or director including employees and ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h enquiry as it thinks fit and giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard, deny the benefit of input tax credit to such registered dealer who has claimed input tax credit based on such invoice, bill or cash memorandum from such date. (14) Where the business of a registered dealer is transferred on account of change in ownership or on account of sale, merger, amalgamation, lease or transfer of the business to a joint venture with the specific provision for transfer of liabilities of such business, then, the registered dealer shall be entitled to transfer the input tax credit lying unutilized in his accounts to such sold, merged, amalgamated, leased or transferred concern. The transfer of input tax credit shall be allowed only if the stock of inputs, as such, or in process, or the capital goods is also transferred to the new ownership on which credit has been availed of are duly accounted for, subject to the satisfaction of the assessing authority. (15) Where a registered dealer has purchased any taxable goods from another dealer and has availed input tax credit in respect of the said goods and if the registration certificate of the selling dealer is cancelled by the appropri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g authority. (1) The assessment in respect of the dealer shall be on the basis of return relating to his turnover submitted in the prescribed manner within the prescribed period. (2) The assessing authority shall accept the returns submitted for the year, by the dealer, if the returns are in the prescribed form and accompanied with the prescribed documents and proof of payment of tax. Every such dealer shall be deemed to have been assessed for the year on the 31st day of October of the succeeding year Provided that in respect of such returns submitted for the years 2006 - 2007, 2007 - 2008, 2008 - 2009, 2009 - 2010 and 2010 - 2011, on which assessment order are not passed shall be deemed to have been assessed on the 30th day of June 2012. Prior to the Amendment made by the Fifth Amendment Act 23 of 2012, notified by GO.No.82. as effective from 19th June2012, this sub - section was as under : (2) The assessing authority shall accept the returns submitted for the year, by the dealer, if the returns are accompanied by the proof of payment of tax and the documents prescribed, and on such acceptance, the assessing authority shall pass an assessment order. (3) Notwithstanding....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the dealer to pay by way of penalty, a sum which shall be, in the case of failure to submit return, one hundred and fifty percent of the tax assessed: Provided that no penalty under this sub - section shall be imposed after the period of five years from the date of assessment order under this Section unless the dealer affected has had a reasonable opportunity of showing cause against such imposition. (6) (a) Any dealer assessed under sub - section (4) may, within a period of thirty days from the date of service of the assessment order, apply to the assessing authority for re - assessment, along with the correct and complete return as prescribed. On such application, the assessing authority shall, if it is satisfied that the failure to submit the return in time was due to reasons beyond the control of the applicant, cancel the assessment made and make a fresh assessment on the basis of the return submitted: Provided that no application shall be entertained under this sub - section unless it is accompanied by satisfactory proof of the payment of tax admitted by the applicant to be due or any such instalment thereof as might have become payable, as the case may be. (b) If t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....being heard, and for the sufficient reasons to be recorded in writing - (a) in the case of an order of assessment (i) confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment or the penalty or both; (ii) set aside the assessment and direct the assessing authority to make a fresh assessment after such further inquiry as may be directed; or (iii) pass such other orde rs as he may think fit; or b) in the case of any other order, confirm, cancel or vary such order: Provided that at the hearing of any appeal, the appropriate authority shall have the right to be heard either in person or by a representative. (4) Notwithstanding that an appeal has been preferred under sub - section (1), the tax shall be paid in accordance with the order of assessment against which the appeal has been preferred: Provided that the Appellate Deputy Commissioner may, in his discretion, give such directions as he thinks fit in regard to the payment of the tax before the disposal of the appeal, if the appellant furnishes sufficient security to his satisfaction, in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed: Provided further that the directions given under the first proviso shall stand vacated, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sistant Commissioner (Assessment) shall have the right to be heard either in person or by a representative. (4) Notwithstanding that an appeal has been preferred under sub - section (1), the tax shall be paid in accordance with the order of assessment against which the appeal has been preferred: Provided that the Appellate Deputy Commissioner may, in his discretion, give such directions as he thinks fit, in regard to the payment of the tax before the disposal of the appeal, if the appellant furnishes sufficient security to his satisfaction, in such manner, as may be prescribed: Provided further that the directions given under the first proviso shall stand vacated, if no order is passed under sub - section (3) within a period of one hundred and eighty days of the issue of order under the said proviso. As per Section 51 of the Act, any person objecting to the order passed by the appropriate authority under Section 22, Section 24, Section 26, sub - sections (1), (2), (3) and (4) of section 27, section 28, section 29, section 34 or sub - section (2) of section 40 other than an order passed by a Deputy Commissioner (Assessment) may, within a period of thirty days from the date o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fter the expiration of the first mentioned period of thirty days, if he is satisfied that the applicant had sufficient cause for not presenting the application within the first mentioned period. (2) An application for revision shall be in the prescribed form and shall be verified in the prescribed manner. (3) On admitting an application for revision, the Deputy Commissioner may call for and examine the record of the order or proceeding against which the application has been preferred and may make such inquiry or cause such inquiry to be made and, subject to the provisions of this Act, pass such order thereon as he thinks fit. (4) Notwithstanding that an application has been preferred under sub - section (1), the tax, fee or other amount shall be paid in accordance with the order or proceeding against which the application has been preferred: Provided that the Joint Commissioner may in his discretion give such directions as he thinks fit, in regard to the payment of such tax, fee or other amount before the disposal of revision, if the applicant furnishes sufficient security to his satisfaction in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed. (5) No order under this se....