https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350984 Where a special tax statute provides appeal, revision and rectification against assessment orders, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked unless a recognised exception to the rule of alternative remedy is shown. Applying that principle to assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, the High Court noted the existence of a complete statutory remedial framework and held that the writ appeals were not maintainable because the assessee had not exhausted those remedies. The dismissal of the writ petitions was therefore upheld. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350984 Where a special tax statute provides appeal, revision and rectification against assessment orders, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be invoked unless a recognised exception to the rule of alternative remedy is shown. Applying that principle to assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, the High Court noted the existence of a complete statutory remedial framework and held that the writ appeals were not maintainable because the assessee had not exhausted those remedies. The dismissal of the writ petitions was therefore upheld. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 31 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=350984