Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (12) TMI 1622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e office premises and recovered various records and documents. They also conducted physical stock verification and detected shortage of finished goods of 52.505 MT and inputs of 11.420 MT of Alloy Steel ingots. The said officers also recorded the statement of Sri Gourav Jajodia, Director of the appellant company. A Show Cause Notice dated 13/05/2011, was issued proposing demand of duty of Rs. 11,10,228/- alongwith interest and imposition of penalty on appellant No.1 and imposition of penalty on Sri Gaurav Jajodia, appellant No.2. It was also proposed to appropriate the amount of Rs. 8,00,000/- deposited voluntarily on ad hoc basis. 2. It was alleged that during the period 12/08/2008 to 30/11/2008, appellant No.1 removed the finished goods ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the annexure to Show Cause Notice and also referred to the case laws. 6. Heard both sides and perused the records. On perusal of the search list dated 5/12/2008, it is evident that the 48 challans were recovered from the premises of the appellant company. Appellant No.2, Director of the appellant company in his statement dated 26/08/2010 admitted that no central excise duty has been paid against clearances affected vide original challans. He also admitted that the duty liability may be adjusted from the ad hoc payment of Rs. 8,00,000/-. I find that the appellants have not given any explanation in respect of recovery of 48 challans from their premises. The Ld. Counsel, on behalf of the appellants attempted to establish that the said challa....