https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194829 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on the shortage of goods and inputs against the appellant company, as evidence linked recovered challans to their premises and the Director admitted to non-payment of central excise duty. Penalties imposed on both appellants were upheld, but the penalty on the Director was reduced to &8377; 50,000 considering the circumstances. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejection of appeals was affirmed, and the decision was rendered by Shri P.K. Choudhary, Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata on 29/12/2016. en-us Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Sep 2017 11:52:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194829 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on the shortage of goods and inputs against the appellant company, as evidence linked recovered challans to their premises and the Director admitted to non-payment of central excise duty. Penalties imposed on both appellants were upheld, but the penalty on the Director was reduced to &8377; 50,000 considering the circumstances. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejection of appeals was affirmed, and the decision was rendered by Shri P.K. Choudhary, Judicial Member of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata on 29/12/2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194829