2017 (8) TMI 811

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Respondent. ORDER The petitioner impugned the demand issued by the respondents, i.e., Customs Department on 9-2-2016 claiming that the recovery to the tune of in excess of Rs. 87 lacs is unjustified and not authorised by law. By an Order-in-Original dated 17-3-2005, the petitioner's proprietorship concern Ashoka Metal Industries was asked to pay Customs duty on 183.013 MTs of copper scrap v....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that he has deposited the liabilities. 2. The petition is bereft of any particulars as to when the duty and penalty (in excess of Rs. 77 lakhs imposed upon the petitioner's proprietorship concern + a further sum of Rs. 10 lacs constituting the redemption fine imposed on the goods provisionally released) were paid. Instead the petitioner seeks to contend that the payment of personal penalty ....