<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 811 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346753</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Customs Department&#039;s demand in a case involving challenges to the payment of Customs duty, fines, and penalties on copper scrap. The petitioner&#039;s appeals were dismissed, including a Special Leave Petition (SLP). The Court found the petitioner&#039;s arguments lacking substance, emphasizing the failure to provide specific payment details and the inability of a personal penalty to absolve all liabilities. The Court upheld the fines and penalties imposed by the Customs Department, deeming the petition an abuse of the court process and ordering the petitioner to deposit costs and confirm payment within a specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:29:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=486446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 811 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346753</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Customs Department&#039;s demand in a case involving challenges to the payment of Customs duty, fines, and penalties on copper scrap. The petitioner&#039;s appeals were dismissed, including a Special Leave Petition (SLP). The Court found the petitioner&#039;s arguments lacking substance, emphasizing the failure to provide specific payment details and the inability of a personal penalty to absolve all liabilities. The Court upheld the fines and penalties imposed by the Customs Department, deeming the petition an abuse of the court process and ordering the petitioner to deposit costs and confirm payment within a specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=346753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>