2016 (7) TMI 1336
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or Counsel for C. Muthusaravanan, B. Vijay Karthikeyan, R. Vijayakumar, K. Gokul, D. Sivaraman and S. Muthalraj, Advocates, for the Respondent. ORDER This miscellaneous petition coming on for orders on this day and upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. V. Sasikumar, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr. B. Vijay Karthike....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... authoritative trade practice, as per Article 286(1)(b) and Article 286(2) of the Constitution of India. 3. Continuing further, it is the stand of the petitioner that the title of the goods was on the basis of 'Bill of Ladings' carrier documents vested with the first respondent/writ petitioner and after the High Sea Sale Agreement, the title of goods transfers to their Firm and prior to th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....m Tanzania on 14-4-2016 and the Bills of Lading were also issued in the name of Glory Cashews and it was informed that a mistake had crept in the Office of the third respondent/Cosco India Shipping Private Limited, Tuticorin, because of which, the name of the first respondent/writ petitioner came to be mentioned in the Import Goods Manifesto and steps were taken to correct the mistake by making su....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....d sixth respondent in the main writ petition. 7. This Court has given its anxious consideration to the stand taken by the respective parties and is of the considered view that since the petitioner in WMP (MD) No. 8152 of 2016 in W.P. (MD) No. 9351 of 2016 claims that he is one of the bona fide purchasers of Raw Cashews from the first respondent/writ petitioner and had entered into a valid ....


TaxTMI
TaxTMI