<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1336 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193785</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the petitioner&#039;s impleadment as the sixth respondent in the main writ petition. The petitioner, claiming to be a bona fide purchaser of Raw Cashew Nuts under a valid High Sea Sale Agreement, demonstrated a legitimate interest in safeguarding their rights. Despite opposition from the fifth respondent, the Court exercised judicial discretion in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of fair play and justice in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2017 08:10:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=485858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1336 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193785</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the petitioner&#039;s impleadment as the sixth respondent in the main writ petition. The petitioner, claiming to be a bona fide purchaser of Raw Cashew Nuts under a valid High Sea Sale Agreement, demonstrated a legitimate interest in safeguarding their rights. Despite opposition from the fifth respondent, the Court exercised judicial discretion in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of fair play and justice in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=193785</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>