Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (7) TMI 801

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....esentative and perused the records. 4. The issue that falls for consideration in this appeal is regarding the refund of the amount of service tax paid on the various services received by the respondent claiming that these services were utilised/ for rendering exported output services. The adjudicating authority had partially allowed and partially rejected the refund claims and held that few services of which refund claims are filed cannot be co-related. The First Appellate Authority has gone into detail as to each and every service is detail and allowed the appeal of the respondent and granted relief. Revenue is aggrieved by the First Appellate Authority's order of allowing the appeal of CENVAT credit on Event Management service, Busin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Nos. 3,5,10 of the Table in Annexure-I of the impugned order, on the ground that the services had no nexus with the output service The services have been received in connection with conferences, business meetings, for induction programs, skill enhancement of employees; and held admissible in Coca Cola (India) Vs. CCE, Pune-III [2009-TIOL-449-HC-ST] The services is consumed for organising events such as staff offsite, service awards, ERD awards etc., meant to attain higher efficiency level for delivery of output. Held admissible in Willis Processing Services Vs. CST, Mumbai-II [2015 (38) S.T.R. 169 (Tri. Mumbai)]; HCL Technologies Vs. CCE, Noida [2015 (40) S.T.R. 369 (Tri. Del.)]; Accenture Services Vs. CST, Mumbai [2015 (40) S.T.R. 719 (....