<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 801 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the admissibility of services like Event Management, Business Auxiliary &amp;amp; Support, and Management/Business Consultant services for credit and refund. The Tribunal found these services directly related to the rendered output services, citing legal precedents, and set aside the denial of credit and refund, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=482610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 801 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the First Appellate Authority&#039;s decision, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirming the admissibility of services like Event Management, Business Auxiliary &amp;amp; Support, and Management/Business Consultant services for credit and refund. The Tribunal found these services directly related to the rendered output services, citing legal precedents, and set aside the denial of credit and refund, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>