2017 (7) TMI 560

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sandeep Chatterjee and Mr Sumit, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr Deepak Anand, Junior Standing Counsel ORDER 1. This is an appeal by the Assessee under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 ('CE Act') directed against the order dated 11th January, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ('CESTAT') in Ex. Appeal No. 3575, 3983 of 2010, Ex. Appeal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nd two of the orders in the assessment proceedings having been passed by the Commissioner Customs, Excise, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, the Appellant would have to approach the High Court of Uttarakhand with the statutory appeal. 4. As regards the objections of the Respondent that an appeal against the impugned order of the CESTAT is maintainable only before the Supreme Court under Section 35L of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hand with a properly constituted appeal. 6. Mr. Ganesh next contends that the stay granted by this Court on 27th March, 2017 restraining the Respondent from enforcing the pending demands arising out of the show cause notice, penalty and other amounts arising therefrom during the pendency of appeal may be extended by a period of two weeks to enable the Appellant to approach the Uttarakhand High ....