https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345448 The Court determined that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, directing the Appellant to approach the High Court of Uttarakhand. The Appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal to file a proper appeal before the High Court, which was granted with the Respondent's agreement. An extension of the stay order was allowed for two weeks to facilitate filing in the High Court. The Appellant was instructed to address the question of limitation before the High Court, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with liberty granted to the Appellant. en-us Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:24:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345448 The Court determined that it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the appeal filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, directing the Appellant to approach the High Court of Uttarakhand. The Appellant sought withdrawal of the appeal to file a proper appeal before the High Court, which was granted with the Respondent's agreement. An extension of the stay order was allowed for two weeks to facilitate filing in the High Court. The Appellant was instructed to address the question of limitation before the High Court, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with liberty granted to the Appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 12 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=345448