Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (6) TMI 811

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cts financed by Asian Development Bank. During the course of audit, it was found that the appellant has cleared these machines i.e. Excavator Loaders and Earthmoving Machinery to the contractors and not supplied to the Project Implementing Authority. After completion of the projects, the said machines remained with the contractors, therefore, the appellant is not entitled for benefit of Notification No. 108/95 ibid. In these set of facts, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant to deny the benefit of Exemption Notification No. 108/95. Consequently, to demand duty along with interest and to impose penalty on the appellant. The matter was adjudicated wherein the adjudicating authority held that as the goods have not been supplied to t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, the appellant is entitled for benefit of the above Notification. Merely, on the ground that the goods have been supplied to the contractor directly who has executed the project in question and after the implementation of the products the machine shall remain with the property of the contractor cannot be reasons to deny the benefit of notification as held by this tribunal in the case of Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. (supra) wherein this Tribunal has observed as under: 3. It is not the case of the department that the goods have not been supplied to the projects financed by international organisations. The goods were supplied to various sub contractors for the Golden Quadrilateral Project financed by Asian Development Bank. Goods have also ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....project and after the completion of the projects, the goods supplied to the various sub contractors were entrusted to retain the goods supplied could not stand in the way of granting, the exemption under the Notification. 8. We do not find any justifiable ground to interfere with the order of the Cestat based on a factual finding and there was no material placed by the Revenue on the allegations of the possible misuse of the goods for unintended purposes by the sub contractors. Secondly, being the beneficial Notification issued in public interest and the project itself being executed fully by the contractors as per the directions of the project implementing Authority, the fact that the machineries were not given directly to the project im....