https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344540 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant correctly availed the benefit of Exemption Notification No.108/95-CE. It emphasized that the conditions of the notification were met and rejected the Adjudicating Authority's decision to deny the exemption. The Tribunal reiterated its previous stance that if goods were supplied to projects financed by international organizations and approved by the Government, the exemption applied. It set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty, emphasizing the importance of interpreting exemption notifications in a manner that upholds their intended benefits. en-us Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344540 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant correctly availed the benefit of Exemption Notification No.108/95-CE. It emphasized that the conditions of the notification were met and rejected the Adjudicating Authority's decision to deny the exemption. The Tribunal reiterated its previous stance that if goods were supplied to projects financed by international organizations and approved by the Government, the exemption applied. It set aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty, emphasizing the importance of interpreting exemption notifications in a manner that upholds their intended benefits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344540