Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (6) TMI 702

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndal The Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order wherein the Ld. Commissioner (A) allowed the benefit of exemption Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003 to the respondent. 2. The facts of the case are that the respondent is engaged in manufacturer of electronic items at Khasra No.380/1, 382/2, (Plot No.3) Sector-I, Parvaanoo (HP) for which the declaration under Notification NO. 76....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5 and the respondent have only change their factory premises and seeking intimation the change of address by the Respondent claiming as per earlier declaration. Aggrieved from the said order, the revenue is before us. 3. On the other hand, the Ld. AR submits that the respondent has not filed due declaration while intimating to the department of change of address, therefore, they are not entitled ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... benefit of the notification by observing as under: On merits also the contention of the appellant is that there is not provisions in the Notification No.49-50/2003-CE that on shifting of existing unit in respect of which the manufacturer was already availing exemption, from one notified area to another the exemption will not be available. I fully agree with this contention of the Appellant also....