<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (6) TMI 702 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344431</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A) in favor of the respondent, ruling that shifting an existing unit to a new location covered by the Notification did not disqualify the respondent from the exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE. The Tribunal emphasized that no fresh declaration was required when relocating an existing unit within the same Notification coverage. As the respondent had informed the department about the shift and fulfilled the necessary declaration requirements, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the grant of exemption to the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=472511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (6) TMI 702 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344431</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Ld. Commissioner (A) in favor of the respondent, ruling that shifting an existing unit to a new location covered by the Notification did not disqualify the respondent from the exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE. The Tribunal emphasized that no fresh declaration was required when relocating an existing unit within the same Notification coverage. As the respondent had informed the department about the shift and fulfilled the necessary declaration requirements, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the grant of exemption to the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=344431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>