Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1971 (1) TMI 117

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....realise certain cesses as well as contributions from the Thikanedars or Atiyadars in accordance with law it had imposed certain cesses under Section 31 of the Jaipur District Boards Act, 1947 and it was entitled to collect the said cess as well as the contribution from the respondent who was the Thikanedar of Sikar, for the years 1951-52, 1952-53 and from April 1, 1954 to June 16, 1954,the date on which all zamindaries were abolished. The further case of the plaintiff was that the account of the cess and the contribution due from the respondent was taken on September 15, 1953 and a detailed statement of account was sent to the respondent demanding from him a sum of ₹ 55,791/1/-as arrears due from him. In response to the demand made by....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... suit, yet did not accept the plea of the respondent that the suit was not maintainable on the ground that the said plea had not been taken by the respondent in his written statement. 4.As we are of opinion that the suit was not maintainable we have not thought it necessary to go into the question of limitation. In our opinion, the High Court was wrong in holding that the respondent had not pleaded that the suit was not maintainable. In paragraph 1 of the written statement of the respondent, it was specifically pleaded that: ...that the right of the District Board to levy and realise cess and contribution from the Government and the Thikanedars or Atiyadars is not admitted and is categorically denied. 5. This is a specific plea. On the b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hall be entitled to realise from their tenants and the sub-grantees, and the sub-grantees from their tenants, the sums due under Clause 2 of Section 3. 33. Government shall give a grant equivalent in amount to the cess levied in Khalsa area by the Board. 34. (1) Government shall realise from each State-grantee an amount equal to the aggregate of the amounts of cess payable to him by his tenants. 8. From a perusal of these provisions, it is clear that in the matter of collection of casses by the Thikanedar from his sub-grantees and tenants in the Non-Khalsa area, he has to pay the same along with his contribution to the Government and the Government thereafter makes it over to the District Board. He has no liability to make over the colle....