https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192739 The Supreme Court held that the suit brought by the District Board, Sikar, against the respondent was not maintainable as the District Board lacked the authority to demand cess payments directly from the Thikanedar, as mandated by the Jaipur District Boards Act, 1947. Despite the High Court's dismissal of the suit based on limitation, the Supreme Court focused on the specific legal plea raised by the respondent regarding the District Board's lack of standing to collect cess and contributions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with costs, emphasizing the lack of authority of the District Board rather than the issue of limitation. en-us Thu, 28 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:05:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192739 The Supreme Court held that the suit brought by the District Board, Sikar, against the respondent was not maintainable as the District Board lacked the authority to demand cess payments directly from the Thikanedar, as mandated by the Jaipur District Boards Act, 1947. Despite the High Court's dismissal of the suit based on limitation, the Supreme Court focused on the specific legal plea raised by the respondent regarding the District Board's lack of standing to collect cess and contributions. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed with costs, emphasizing the lack of authority of the District Board rather than the issue of limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192739