2017 (5) TMI 1187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... None Respondent - Represented by Shri V.K. Agarwal, Addl. Commr. (AR) ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair The background of the case is that this Tribunal vide Order reported Shridhar Casting Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur - 2012 (281) ELT 270 (Tri-Mum) passed a stay order, whereby the Tribunal directed the applicant to make pre-deposit of 50% of the duty along with 25% of pe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....4 in the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which was dismissed on 09.7.2014. Now the applicant filed this ROA as well as EH application to consider it on the merit of the case and relied upon various judgments, which are as follows: - (a) M/s SRJ Peety Steels Pvt. Ltd. - 2015 (327) ELT 737 (Tri-Mum) (b) R.A. Castings Pvt. Ltd. - 2009 (237) ELT 674 (Tri) (c) Pearl Enterprises Vs. Union of India -....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides. We find that as per the Hon'ble High Court order, the applicant was bound to deposit 25% of the duty amount as pre-deposit for hearing the appeal by this Tribunal. The order of the deposit of 25% has been affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as submitted by the applicant in their ROA application. In these circumstances, t....