https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343449 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for restoration as the applicant failed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement set by the High Court, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court. Despite various legal actions, including a review application and a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, the pre-deposit remained at 25% of the duty. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of fulfilling this obligation, leading to the dismissal of the application for restoration and an early hearing on 25.04.2017. The applicant was granted liberty to make the pre-deposit as directed but could not proceed without meeting the requirement. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 25 May 2017 10:26:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343449 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for restoration as the applicant failed to comply with the pre-deposit requirement set by the High Court, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court. Despite various legal actions, including a review application and a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, the pre-deposit remained at 25% of the duty. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of fulfilling this obligation, leading to the dismissal of the application for restoration and an early hearing on 25.04.2017. The applicant was granted liberty to make the pre-deposit as directed but could not proceed without meeting the requirement. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343449