TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (10) TMI 1051
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... by the Revenue in both the appeals are common. However, the grounds taken in ITA No.571/Asr/2015 are reproduced below which are similar in ITA No.572/Asr/2015: "1. That the ld. CIT(A) has erred on the facts and in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 1,49,25,000/- made by the AO on account of Long Term Capital Gains. 2. The ld. CIT(A) has erred both on facts and law in following the judgment of Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of C.S. Atwal & Others vs. CIT, Ludhiana while deleting the addition of Rs. 1,49,25,000/- in the case of the assessee. 3. The ld. CIT(A) has erred both on facts and law in not adjudicating the crucial issue of applicability of section 2(47)(ii) and (vi) of the Act while deleting the addition of Rs....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....umstances that it remains the income of the recipient, even though given up. the tax may be payable. Where, however, the income can be said not to have resulted at all, there is obviously neither accrual nor receipt of income, even though an entry to that, effect might, incineration circumstances, have been made in the books of account." This pronouncement was applied by the Supreme Court in Godhra Electricity Co. Limited vs. CIT, (1997) 225 ITR 746 (SC) and followed by the Calcutta High Court in CIT vs. Balarampur Commercial Enterprises limited, (2003) 262 ITR 439 (Cal.). Relying upon decision in Messrs Shoorji Vallcibhdas & Co. s case (supra), the Supreme Court in CIT vs. Excel Industries Limited (2013) 338 ITR 295 (SC) held that inco....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ue to various orders passed by the Supreme Court and the High Court in PILs. Therefore, the appeals are allowed. Consequently, the substantial questions of law as reproduced in the beginning of the judgment are answered in the manner indicated hereinbefore and the appeals of the assessee are disposed of accordingly." 8. Since the facts and circumstances are similar and the legal issue is common, respectfully following the decision of the H.C. of Punjab and Haryana (Supra). The A.O. is directed to restrict the computation of capital gain to the amounts received by the assessee only subject to law. Balance addition of Rs. 1,49,25,000/- stands deleted." 4. Now, the Department is in appeal before us. 5. The ld. DR relied on the order of t....