Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether capital gains tax was chargeable on the remaining land under the joint development arrangement where possession of the entire land was not given and the conditions of part performance were not satisfied.
Analysis: The appeal turned on whether the transaction fell within section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by attracting section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Tribunal followed the binding High Court decision on the same development agreement and held that the mandatory requirements of section 53A were not met because possession of the entire land had not been handed over in part performance and the developers were not shown to be willing or able to perform their contractual obligations. On that basis, the remaining land could not be treated as transferred for capital gains purposes and no chargeable income had accrued in respect of it.
Conclusion: The addition on account of capital gains on the remaining land was not sustainable and stood deleted, so the Revenue's appeals failed.