Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1969 (8) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... us, is an unregistered firm carrying on business in the supply of stores to the military department on contract. There were two partners, Kallu Mal and J.P. Srivastava, whose shares where equal. The assessment of the firm for the assessment year 1959-60 was completed on September 17, 1960, but before that one of the partners, namely, Kallu Mal, had already been assessed on his share income from the firm. The assessee appealed to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner against the assessment made by the Income-tax Officer on September 17, 1960, and one of the grounds raised in the appeal was that partner, Kallu Mal, having already been assessed in respect of the share income from the firm, the Income-tax Officer was not competent again to proc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s set out above. An answer to the question referred will be found in the clear language of section 3 of the Act, which is the charging section. Section 3 runs as follows : " Charge of income-tax.-Where any Central Act enacts that income-tax shall be charged for any year at any rate or rates tax at that rate or those rates shall be charged for that year in accordance with, and subject to the provisions of, this Act in respect of the total income of the previous year of every individual, Hindu undivided family, company and local authority, and of every firm and other association of persons or the partners of the firm or the members of the association individually. " The charging section quoted above imposes tax on the total income of six d....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he hands of the partners and again in the hands of the unregistered firm. " As already stated, the charging section contemplates assessment either of the firm or its partners or, if the assessee is an association of persons, assessment may be made on either the association or, in the alternative, on its members. This court was perhaps the first to expound the clear implications of the charging section in respect of the assessment of an association and its members. In the case of Joti Prasad Agarwal v. Income-tax Officer, decided by a Bench of this court in 1958, it was laid down that once the income of an association has been charged to income-tax in the hands of the members individually, and the assessments were valid assessments, there ....