Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an unregistered firm can be assessed after the share income of its partner has already been assessed individually.
Analysis: Section 3 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 charges tax on the total income of a firm or its partners, and the use of the word "or" is disjunctive. The statutory scheme contemplates taxation of the firm or the partners as alternative assessable entities, not both in respect of the same income. Once the department has adopted one course and validly assessed the income in the hands of the partners, it cannot thereafter make a further assessment of the same income in the hands of the firm. The provisions referred to as enabling correction or modification do not confer power to impose a second substantive charge on the same income.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative. The firm could not be assessed again after the partner's share income had already been assessed, and the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The decision affirms that the Income-tax Act, 1922 permits only one assessment route for the same partnership income, either in the hands of the firm or in the hands of the partners individually, but not both.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the charging provision makes a firm and its partners alternative assessable entities in respect of the same income, the income cannot be taxed twice by assessing both the partners and the firm.