Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (7) TMI 1062

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., J. The respondents-claimants filed E.P. in the lower Court for recovery of balance amount of Rs. 19,618/- from the insurance company which amount was said to have been not deposited in pursuance of the Award passed by the lower Tribunal. According to the revision petitioner, the said balance amount was remitted by the insurance company to the Income Tax Department in pursuance of Section 194A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rat High Court that the interest accrued for that financial year should exceed Rs. 50,000/- in order to apply Section 194A of the Act. It is further contended that interest awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal is only 7.5% per annum and that if interest is calculated for each person separately for each year, then interest payable for each claimant in each financial year will not exceed R....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x Authority and request that the income be spread over the period for which payment of interest came to be made. So that the income for the purpose of assessing tax for the relevant assessment year could be computed. The Court below has exceeded its jurisdiction in' directing the petitioner to deposit the TDS amount deducted from the compensation payable to the respondents-claimants." 3. To....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the above effect. No doubt, the revision petitioner company should not have deducted and remitted TDS on total interest amount of all J. Drs. (sic. D. Hrs.) put together, but should have divided interest relating to each of the D. Hrs. and should have remitted TDS only in respect of interest payable to that J. Dr. (sic. D. Hrs.) whose amount exceeded Rs. 50,000/-. It is stated that there is no pro....