<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 1062 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191533</link>
    <description>The civil revision petition was allowed, and the lower Court&#039;s order, along with the warrant for execution, was set aside. The Court held that income tax should only be payable on interest accrued year after year, and the insurance company had already deducted and remitted the TDS amount to the Income Tax Department. Claimants could approach the Income Tax Assessing Authority for refund if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=465034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 1062 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191533</link>
      <description>The civil revision petition was allowed, and the lower Court&#039;s order, along with the warrant for execution, was set aside. The Court held that income tax should only be payable on interest accrued year after year, and the insurance company had already deducted and remitted the TDS amount to the Income Tax Department. Claimants could approach the Income Tax Assessing Authority for refund if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=191533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>