Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1966 (4) TMI 16

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... income-tax under section 18A of the Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), from the company. Admittedly, the company did not pay any part of the demand. The stand taken by it was that, being entitled to a certain refund and the amount of refund being in excess of the demand, no payment was required to be made. In the writ petition and the affidavit filed in support of it, an averment was made that the sum of Rs. 7,415-5-0 out of the amount which the company was entitled to receive as refund was adjusted by the Income-tax Officer towards the payment of advance income tax demanded from the company. This position is admitted on behalf of the income-tax department in the counter-affidavit. On the ground of default in pay....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of December and 15th day of March in that year, respectively, an amount equal to one quarter of the income-tax and super-tax payable on so much of such income as is included in his total income of the latest previous year in respect of which he has been assessed, ....... (6) Where in any year an assessee has paid tax under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) on the basis of his own estimate, and the tax so paid is less than eighty per cent. of the tax determined on the basis of the regular assessment (reduced by the amount of tax deductible in accordance with the provisions of section 18 on any income, other than income chargeable under the head ' Salaries ', included in such assessment), so far as such tax relates to income other than i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....made " is comprehensive enough to include a case of partial non-payment. That expression, in our judgment, means when the amount due has not been paid, whatever be the amount, whole or part. Mr. Pachauri has placed reliance upon the provisions of sub-section (6) of section 18A of the Act. His contention is that the use of the words " interest calculated in the manner laid down in sub-section (6) " occurring in sub-section (8) suggests that the provisions of sub-section (6) have been made applicable to proceedings under sub-section (8) and that inasmuch as subsection (6) in its operation is confined to a case where a payment made under sub-section (2) or (3) of section 18A is ultimately, at the time of final assessment, found to be short,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onvenience only, did not insert in subsection (8) the words " simple interest at the rate of six per cent. per annum from the first day of January, in the financial year in which the tax was liable to be paid up to the date of regular assessment shall be payable by the assessee upon the amount by which the tax so paid falls short " and just used the words " interest calculated in the manner laid down in sub-section (6) shall be added to the tax as determined on the basis of the regular assessment ". We are, therefore, satisfied that the first submission of Mr. Pachauri is without any merits and for that reason we overrule it. It is true that Brij Lal Gupta J. disposed of a similar submission made before him on the ground that the adjustm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....company and for the reasons, which we have already given in our judgment, we have come to the conclusion that, in the circumstances of the case, interest was payable by the company on the balance of the amount due from it as advance income-tax. We find some support from Gursahai Saigal v. Commissioner of Income-tax. Their Lordships have observed as follows: " That sub-section (8) intended to and did in the clearest terms impose a charge for interest seems to us to be beyond dispute. It says that interest calculated in a certain manner ' shall be added to the tax '. We do not here have to resort to any equitable rule of construction or to alter the meaning of the language used or to add to or vary it in order to arrive at the conclusion t....