Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, under section 18A(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, interest could be charged where only part of the advance tax demand remained unpaid after adjustment of a refund. (ii) Whether a separate order determining or awarding the amount of interest was before the sum could be charged.
Issue (i): Whether, under section 18A(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, interest could be charged where only part of the advance tax demand remained unpaid after adjustment of a refund.
Analysis: The expression "no payment of tax has been made" was construed as comprehensive enough to cover cases of partial non-payment. The reference in sub-section (8) to the manner laid down in sub-section (6) was treated as a reference only to the method of calculation of interest and not as making sub-section (6) control the applicability of sub-section (8). The liability created by sub-section (8) therefore operated on the amount of advance tax remaining unpaid.
Conclusion: The charge of interest was valid and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether a separate order determining or awarding the amount of interest was required before the sum could be charged.
Analysis: Sub-section (8) required the interest to be calculated in the prescribed manner and added to the tax determined on regular assessment. The Act did not prescribe a separate order awarding interest as a condition precedent. Inclusion of the amount in the assessment form accompanying the demand notice was sufficient compliance.
Conclusion: No separate order was necessary and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The statutory scheme under section 18A fastened liability to interest on unpaid advance tax, and the assessment form could validly include the computed amount without any independent order; the appeal therefore failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Under section 18A(8) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, interest is chargeable on the amount of advance tax remaining unpaid, and the provision requiring calculation in the manner of sub-section (6) is only a machinery provision for computation, not a limitation on the substantive liability or a requirement of a separate interest order.