Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (3) TMI 1002

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the appellant received orders for Air Cooled Condenser and a Fin Fan Cooler Assembly from M/s Shreeram EPC Pvt. Ltd., who were awarded a contract for setting up a 77 MW coal based captive power plant on EPC basis in an International Competitive Bidding by OPG Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. The Project Implementation Authority M/s OPG Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. has issued a Project Authority Certificate wherein the said authority had allowed M/s Shreeram EPC Ltd. and GEI Industrial Systems Ltd. to import various goods without payment of duty and also to procure from indigenous sources without payment of duty. The appellant sought benefit of exemption from central excise duty for the said goods manufactured under Notification No.6/2006-CE dated ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ertificate as Project Implementing Authority where the name of the appellant was specifically mentioned as sub-contractor.The appellant has sought the benefit of exemption Notification as the law is settled by the Tribunal in the case of CST Ltd. vs. C.C. & C.E., Hyderabad -I - 2007 (217) ELT 513 (Tri- Bang.); Sarita Steel vs. C.C.E., Visakhapatnam - 2011 (264) ELT 313 (T) and Cords Cables Industries Ltd. vs. C.C.E., Jaipur -I - 2011 (267) ELT 258 (Tri-Del.). 3. The Ld. A.R. for Revenue on the other hand draws our attention to the findings recorded by the adjudicating authority in paragraph No.17 of the impugned order. He submits that the appellant had imported items i.e. non-alloy steel plate, CS tube, aluminium coil, Fin Stock/strip, A....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tractor for supply of Fin Fan Cooler Assembly. Based upon the said project implementation certificate issued by the OPG Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. the appellant imported various raw material required for manufacturing Fin Fan Cooler. The appellant consumed these imported duty free raw materials for manufacturing of coil to be used in Air Cooled Condenser and Fin Fan Cooler Assembly and cleared the same to the site where 77 MW coal based captive power plant being erected. 6. We find that the adjudicating authority is denying the exemption notification to the appellant only on the ground that the appellant had not participated in ICB and that he had imported the raw material. We find that similar/identical issue was before the Bench in res....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cleared by the appellants should be considered as "goods supplied against International Competitive Bidding". There is absolutely no need that the appellants themselves should have been the bidder in International Competitive Bidding. In huge projects, the main contractor does not do everything. There is always a system of sub-contractors. If we take a view that the goods cleared by sub-contractors are not entitled for exemption on the ground they are not the bidders, the very purpose of the Notification would be defeated because the main contractor will be having hundreds of sub-contractors in Mega Projects. In our view, inasmuch as the appellants had supplied the goods to M/s. BHEL, who are the bidders of International Competitive Bidding....