https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340499 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant, as a sub-contractor supplying goods to the main contractor involved in International Competitive Bidding (ICB) for a power project, was eligible for exemption under Notification No.91/2004-Cus and No.6/2006-CE. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant satisfied the conditions of the notification and should not be denied the benefit solely for not participating in the bidding process themselves. Previous cases and judicial pronouncements supported the appellant's eligibility for the exemption, leading to the setting aside of the lower authorities' decision. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340499 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the appellant, as a sub-contractor supplying goods to the main contractor involved in International Competitive Bidding (ICB) for a power project, was eligible for exemption under Notification No.91/2004-Cus and No.6/2006-CE. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant satisfied the conditions of the notification and should not be denied the benefit solely for not participating in the bidding process themselves. Previous cases and judicial pronouncements supported the appellant's eligibility for the exemption, leading to the setting aside of the lower authorities' decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=340499