2015 (11) TMI 1641

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri R.R. Dave, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER The brief facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of 'Khaini' falling under chapter sub-heading 24039910 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The machines installed in the factory of the appellant were shut down during the period 14-9-2011 to 30-9-2011. Thus, the appellant had filed the abatement cl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appeal in favour of the respondent. Hence, this present appeal by Revenue before this Tribunal. The grievance of the Revenue appellant in this appeal is that since the conditions of the notification dated 27-2-2010 (supra) have not been complied with by the respondent in totality, the abatement provided therein shall not be available. 2. Heard the ld. counsel for both sides and perused t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lant does not appear to have prejudiced the interest of the department. It is only in the nature of innocuous non adherence of the time-limit of removal of the goods. 12. It is settled law that for unintended in fractions of procedures substantial right of the appellant cannot be frustrated. The appellant already deposited the duty amount in advance for future manufacture and clearance of ....