<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1641 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190423</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi upheld the decision in favor of the respondent, emphasizing substantial compliance with notification requirements and the preservation of substantive rights despite procedural lapses. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the eligibility of the respondent for the abatement benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 21:24:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1641 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190423</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi upheld the decision in favor of the respondent, emphasizing substantial compliance with notification requirements and the preservation of substantive rights despite procedural lapses. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the eligibility of the respondent for the abatement benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>