Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (1) TMI 1016

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at arise for consideration is the main respondent M/s. Hiravati International Pvt. (HIPL) exported 180 consignments of fish and fish products during the period 1998-99 to 2001-02 through JNPT and claimed DEPB credit by availing various percentage of FOB value as per relevant public notice issued by DGFT. On an investigation carried out by the department, it was noticed that the various percentage of DEPB credit claimed by HIPL was incorrect as the condition for entitlement of credit on export of fish and fish products, was subject to observation of prescribed standard input output norms in the usage of preservatives and chemicals in exported goods. It is the case of the revenue in the show-cause notice that the statements of the persons fro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... investigation are carried out by DRI/ custom clearly prove that no chemicals or preservative are used in export product, such cases should be proceeding against the exporter. It is his submission that in the case in hand the statement of the partner is indicative of non-usage of preservatives. It is his further submission that the quantum of preservatives used by HIPL in the case in hand is meagre, in such cases, DEPB benefit is to be restricted to 4% of the FOB Value while HIPL has taken additional benefit in excess of 4% of FOB value. 4. Ld. counsel appearing for HIPL submits that the statement of General manager is very clear and states that HIPL had used meagre quantity of chemicals and preservatives in the goods exported. He would dr....