https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337936 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent company in a case where the revenue challenged an Order-in-Original dropping proceedings on DEPB credit claims for fish exports. The Tribunal found that the company's usage of preservatives and chemicals, although not meeting standard norms, still qualified for DEPB benefits according to a relevant circular. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering evidence and upheld the lower authorities' decision, dismissing the revenue's appeals for lack of merit. en-us Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 16:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337936 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent company in a case where the revenue challenged an Order-in-Original dropping proceedings on DEPB credit claims for fish exports. The Tribunal found that the company's usage of preservatives and chemicals, although not meeting standard norms, still qualified for DEPB benefits according to a relevant circular. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of considering evidence and upheld the lower authorities' decision, dismissing the revenue's appeals for lack of merit. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=337936