TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2012 (10) TMI 1129
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....artment has filed this appeal for assessment year 2007-08 against order dated 31.1.2011 of ld CIT(A) on the following ground: "On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, Id CIT(A) erred in allowing the claim of the assessee that capital of ₹ 60,64,205 received by the assessee from M/s. Karodia Construction Pvt Ltd., where in the karta of the assessee is a share holder, i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... decision of ITAT Special Bench in the case of ACIT vs. Bhaumik Colour Pvt Ltd. 118 ITD 1/(313 ITR 146(AT), held that loans received by the assessee from M/s. karodia Constructions PLtd., cannot be treated as deemed dividend u/s.2(22)(e) of the Act as recipient of money should be a registered share holder as well as beneficial share holder whereas in the case of the assessee none of the above cond....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 313 ITR 116(Raj) has held that in order to attract the provisions of section 2(22)(e) of the Act, following four conditions are the sine quo non i.e. (i) the assessee should be a shareholder of the company ; (ii) the company should be a closely held company in which the public are not substantially interested ; (iii) there must be payment by way of advance or loan to a shareholder or any pa....