<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189334</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the order of the ld CIT(A) in the appeal against deeming a sum received as dividend under section 2(22)(e) for the assessment year 2007-08. The ITAT ruled that the recipient did not meet the criteria of being a registered and beneficial shareholder in the lending company, as required by legal precedents. Consequently, the department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the ld CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=454308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1129 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189334</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the order of the ld CIT(A) in the appeal against deeming a sum received as dividend under section 2(22)(e) for the assessment year 2007-08. The ITAT ruled that the recipient did not meet the criteria of being a registered and beneficial shareholder in the lending company, as required by legal precedents. Consequently, the department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the decision of the ld CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>