2016 (12) TMI 1205

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....mr. (A.R.), for Appellant Shri S. Suryanarayanan, Advocate, for Respondent Per: M.V. Ravindran: This appeal is filed by the Revenue against Order-in-Appeal No. 98/2004 (JNCH) dated 29.11.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai-II. The Revenue has also filed a stay petition for staying the operation of impugned order. Respondent-assessee has also filed a cross objectio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....100% equity participation in the respondent's company. 6. The first appellate authority while not accepting the findings recorded by the adjudicating authority has held as under:- "As against this the appellants have submitted that the equity participation is not 100% as held by the lower authority but only 50%; that though the SIA had permitted 100% equity participation, the actual particip....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....has been passed contrary to facts as they have demonstrated closed approximation of the declared value as required. I find that this fact has not been assailed by the lower authority nor any evidence has been adduced to show that the declared value not correct except to state that the buyer and a seller are related persons and their relationship has influenced the price. There appears to be no oth....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iled to do so, cannot show the details to the first appellate authority and the same Commissioner (Appeals) has upheld addition of 20% of the value on account of non co-operation from the various assessee. 8. In our considered view, the order passed by the adjudicating authority in enhancement the value of the goods imported by 20% was correctly set aside by the first appellate authority. In ou....