<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1205 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336560</link>
    <description>Mere equity participation or board representation does not, by itself, establish related-person status or justify rejection of transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules unless there is evidence that the relationship influenced the price. The Tribunal found no independent evidence supporting enhancement of the declared import value and agreed that the record did not show the requisite degree of ownership or price influence. The declared value was therefore accepted and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2016 07:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1205 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336560</link>
      <description>Mere equity participation or board representation does not, by itself, establish related-person status or justify rejection of transaction value under the Customs Valuation Rules unless there is evidence that the relationship influenced the price. The Tribunal found no independent evidence supporting enhancement of the declared import value and agreed that the record did not show the requisite degree of ownership or price influence. The declared value was therefore accepted and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>